<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Negotiating Assessments &amp; Feedback in Instructure&#8217;s Grade Form</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jaredstein.org/2010/01/19/negotiating-assessments-feedback-in-instructures-grade-form/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jaredstein.org/2010/01/19/negotiating-assessments-feedback-in-instructures-grade-form/</link>
	<description>Education, Technology, Culture, and the Internet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:28:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stein</title>
		<link>http://jaredstein.org/2010/01/19/negotiating-assessments-feedback-in-instructures-grade-form/comment-page-1/#comment-416</link>
		<dc:creator>Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 17:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredstein.org/?p=1003#comment-416</guid>
		<description>@Scott I think you&#039;re right, though if I&#039;m scoring a blog I can think of a number of reasons for visiting the real thing rather than just the snapshot.

I suppose the reliability also depends on whether or not (1) the student submitted the url of a post or the url of their blog (which might have &quot;Read More&quot; links), (2) whether or not the screen shot is some portion of the page or the whole thing. A portion could mask the length of a document.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott I think you&#8217;re right, though if I&#8217;m scoring a blog I can think of a number of reasons for visiting the real thing rather than just the snapshot.</p>
<p>I suppose the reliability also depends on whether or not (1) the student submitted the url of a post or the url of their blog (which might have &#8220;Read More&#8221; links), (2) whether or not the screen shot is some portion of the page or the whole thing. A portion could mask the length of a document.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Leslie</title>
		<link>http://jaredstein.org/2010/01/19/negotiating-assessments-feedback-in-instructures-grade-form/comment-page-1/#comment-415</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 21:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredstein.org/?p=1003#comment-415</guid>
		<description>Ken&#039;s comment is confusing me - I thought the snapshot image that Instructure took was done at the point of &quot;submission&quot; of the assignment, and stored locall,y precisely to avoid this issue of someone submitting something but then continuing to work on it. How would an umage on the student&#039;s homepage change this? It seemed to me that the *preferred* thing to mark would be this screenshot as it would represent exactly what was submitted. At least that was my understanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken&#8217;s comment is confusing me &#8211; I thought the snapshot image that Instructure took was done at the point of &#8220;submission&#8221; of the assignment, and stored locall,y precisely to avoid this issue of someone submitting something but then continuing to work on it. How would an umage on the student&#8217;s homepage change this? It seemed to me that the *preferred* thing to mark would be this screenshot as it would represent exactly what was submitted. At least that was my understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://jaredstein.org/2010/01/19/negotiating-assessments-feedback-in-instructures-grade-form/comment-page-1/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 07:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredstein.org/?p=1003#comment-411</guid>
		<description>Jared (and others),

It is good to see some tools starting to be created to help teachers provide detailed and timely feedback to students -- after all good feedback is very important to online students, it is time consuming to provide and most institutions don&#039;t resource it very well.

I&#039;d be interested in your, or other&#039;s, thoughts on some software I have created to help teachers save time providing detailed feedback (text, links, images and audio) and an automated marking rubric template. You can see it at http://eMarkingAssistant.com

What other tools to people use to help them provide feedback on electronic assignments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jared (and others),</p>
<p>It is good to see some tools starting to be created to help teachers provide detailed and timely feedback to students &#8212; after all good feedback is very important to online students, it is time consuming to provide and most institutions don&#8217;t resource it very well.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be interested in your, or other&#8217;s, thoughts on some software I have created to help teachers save time providing detailed feedback (text, links, images and audio) and an automated marking rubric template. You can see it at <a href="http://eMarkingAssistant.com" rel="nofollow">http://eMarkingAssistant.com</a></p>
<p>What other tools to people use to help them provide feedback on electronic assignments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Stein</title>
		<link>http://jaredstein.org/2010/01/19/negotiating-assessments-feedback-in-instructures-grade-form/comment-page-1/#comment-410</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Stein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredstein.org/?p=1003#comment-410</guid>
		<description>Right, and I don&#039;t--but it is nice to verify. In this case, for instance, it didn&#039;t tell me anything about the actual content of the assignment--just that there was a there there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right, and I don&#8217;t&#8211;but it is nice to verify. In this case, for instance, it didn&#8217;t tell me anything about the actual content of the assignment&#8211;just that there was a there there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Woodward</title>
		<link>http://jaredstein.org/2010/01/19/negotiating-assessments-feedback-in-instructures-grade-form/comment-page-1/#comment-409</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Woodward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 21:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jaredstein.org/?p=1003#comment-409</guid>
		<description>I would not rely on the screenshot of the URL that was submitted.  Students could easily have a website that is one big image, and then do the work later.  It is a nice feature, but I wouldn&#039;t use it to grade the actual assignment (obviously this depends on the type of assignment and course).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would not rely on the screenshot of the URL that was submitted.  Students could easily have a website that is one big image, and then do the work later.  It is a nice feature, but I wouldn&#8217;t use it to grade the actual assignment (obviously this depends on the type of assignment and course).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
